Monday, August 4, 2014

Blaming Malalaa Yousafzai for In Action of Mullah Military Taliban Alliance over Gaza Massacre.


            
Malalaa yousafzai 


A famous Punjabi saying, ‘digga khoti tooN gussa kumhar tay’ [One is fallen from the donkey but blames the potmaker] is the most appropriate expression for describing certain Pakistani ‘friends of Gaza’ busy blaming Malala for not condemning Israel’s latest aggression. Had Jalib been around, he would have poured his scorn anew, ‘Dartay hain mo’chooN wallaya ik nehti larki say’.

            What unites Ummah is definitely not Israel. It is highly contagious ignorance. Conspiracy theories to vilify Malala when she was shot at by a Talib, reached all the way to Palestine itself. Many aPalestinian declared the attack on  Malala as a mock attack. However, it is our Muslim Indian brethren often proving more Pakistani than Pakistanis.  A Facebook friend (I sometimes wish one also had the option of  Facebook Enemies) from India has also hosted a full fledge ‘poem’ (though badly rhymed) condemning Malala. No counter-check, no verification is considered necessary when it comes to ‘Western agents’.

            Our Facebook jihadis do not even read newspapers, it seems. Honestly, I heard Malala’s statement condemning the Israeli invasion on BBC Urdu before I noticed a Facebook post condemning her for ignoring the Gaza crisis. I was critical of both. Malala, I thought, should not poke her nose everywhere. Likewise, I regretted BBC Urdu’s editorial judgment. Malala is not an expert  on Gaza crisis. She is not a politician She has dedicated herself to the cause of, in particular, girls’ education. In this regard, there is a justification if she travels to Nigeria to express her solidarity with the girl-students kidnapped by Boko Haram. She may be outraged over hundreds of issues on a daily basis. But we should be spared her statements on BBC Urdu and other mainstream media outlets on topics she is hardly expert on, even if she is entitled to hold whatever views and freely express them.

            I was definitely wrong. Malala paid the price for violating Salafi-Sharia the Taliban had imposed in Swat. From now on, she will be paying the price for refusing to toe the Online-Sharia that middle-class, clean-shaven urban  Taliban (but beards in their stomachs) have devised for Pakistani women, peasants and workers.

            While Swat’s mountain Taliban attempted to assassinate her physically, their urban counterparts are trying to assassinate her integrity, commitment, and character till she recants (Will she submit?). I wish I had not written about Malala. I did not before. I still think a coward like myself lacks the moral ground to even pay tribute to Malala’s courage. But her critics unfortunately are people with few scruples. They are not angry at the OIC (justifiably ridiculed as Oh I See!) or the Arab League for betraying the Palestine cause.

            It does not bother Malala-haters that both the Pakistan government and their political leadership, from Imran Khan’s Tehrik-e-Insaf to Nawaz Sharif’s Muslim League have looked the other way as Israel devastates Gaza [I am discounting PPP and ANP since they do not represent the Urban Taliban even if their role is equally regrettable].

Since ‘ignorance is power’ in the case of Malala bashers [even Google is helpless before the power ignorance commands in the blogosphere where Pakistani middle classes operate],   I, therefore, will not blame them for not directing their anger towards Brigadier Zia-ul-Haq for his notorious role in Black September.

 However, now when Malala has condemned the Gaza invasion (please do not ask her to receive a fake Israeli bullet in a mock encounter in Gaza to prove her sincerity), should not Malala critics muster courage and express solidarity with dozens of Gazas regularly created domestically: Imambargahs, Hazara and Christian neighbourhoods, Sufi shrines, Ahmedi mosques, Hindu Bastis and whole of FATA.   

(II)


            Rafeef Ziadah is many things – an activist, scholar, musician, poet. In every role, she is the voice of Palestine. During a demonstration, a western journalist asked her: “Ms Ziadah, don’t you think that everything would be resolved if you would just stop teaching so much hatred to your children?”

            In mainstream western discourses, it is usually not Israel that is posing any problem. The Palestinian-Israeli conflict is explained away by an instinctive Muslim/Palestinian hatred for Jews. Islamophobic clichés strengthened by the rise of Hamas help ease the job. 

            As if to introduce the journalist to the rich tradition of Arabic poetry, Rafeef responded with a dazzling poem, titled, ‘We teach life, sir!’Here is an excerpt: 

“Today, my body was a TV’d massacre.

Today, my body was a TV’d massacre that had to fit into sound-bites and word limits.

Today, my body was a TV’d massacre that had to fit into sound-bites and word limits filled enough with statistics to counter measured response.

And I perfected my English and I learned my UN resolutions.

But still, he asked me, Ms Ziadah, don’t you think that everything would be resolved if you would just stop teaching so much hatred to your children?

Pause.

 I look inside of me for strength to be patient but patience is not at the tip of my tongue as the bombs drop over Gaza.

Patience has just escaped me.

 Pause. 

Smile.

“We teach life, sir!

Rafeef, remember to smile.

Pause

 “We teach life, sir! We Palestinians teach life after they have occupied the last sky.

 “We teach life after they have built their settlements and apartheid walls, after the last skies. We teach life, sir!”

Yet again Israel is pounding Gaza. In the realm of social media, any gesture of solidarity with Palestine earns you liberal wrath. ‘Why do a few dead bodies and a couple of bombs over Gaza bother you so much when the Taliban are massacring innocent Pakistanis next door?’ comes the reprimand. Ironically, this is exactly what the religious right does. Point out any puritan barbarity and in response puritans will cite two imperial/infidel outrages. The way politicised Islam refuses to be a ‘religion of peace’ beyond Nile-to-Kashgar, the liberalism of many Pakistan liberals also begins to wane when the victims at the receiving end of imperial or Zionist barbarisms happen to be ‘uncouth Arabs’.

The outrage over the Gaza bombings is not owing to the fundamentalists’ hegemonic sway over the apocryphal Muslim world, or Talibanisation in the case of Pakistan. Long before the Taliban were even born, Jalib used to mock the mullahs for ignoring the Palestinian cause while Faiz penned ‘Lullaby for a Palestinian Child’ and attributed his ‘Meray Dil Meray Musafir’ to Yasser Arafat.

That Palestine invokes such passions in the Muslim world and beyond mirrors, in the first place, the success of the Palestinian liberation struggle as a political project. Second, symbolised by Leila Khaled, Mehmoud Darwesh, Edward Said and Yasser Arafat, the heroic Palestinian resistance against the last surviving and violent colonial project has invoked a general solidarity worldwide. From post-apartheid South Africa to communist Cuba, Palestine has won global solidarity. After 200 invasion f Gaza, Bolivia and Venezuela severed diplomatic ties with IsraeI In Sweden, a Davis Cup match in 2009 between Sweden and Israel was played in an arena without spectators. Authorities banned any audience for fear of anti-Israel protesters. In fact, Palestine solidarity is much stronger in the west than the Muslim world. Third, history and the west’s guilty conscious/hypocrisy further stoke the Palestinian fire. I would humbly suggest: instead of getting irritated over Gaza, let us learn lessons in resistance and dignity from Palestine. Rafeef Ziadah correctly points out:

We Palestinians wake up every morning to teach the rest of the world life, sir!

(III)


            Dear Liberals! When are you going to stage a Syria-solidarity sit-in? But watch out. A demonstration against the Assad regime will land you in the ISIS camp (by the same logic you bracket the left with Hamas). A demonstration against ISIS will land you in the camp of Iranian Ayotollahs.

sources : http://viewpointonline.net/2014/07/vp212/ridiculing-left-for-solidarity-with-gaza-goading-malala-for-silence-over-gaza

Severe Discrimination by and Bias of Punjabi's to Quota of Other Provinces and their Rights in Jobs and Education

In order to provide equal access to underprivileged/minority groups as well as to enhance the proportion of any under-represented class or area in the society, many countries in the world have devised effective laws and policies that promote equal opportunities and give special preferences to these groups in terms of distribution of resources and services. 

These laws are termed as affirmative actions or positive discrimination and are continuously being reviewed in terms of their implementation and effectiveness. Under these laws all the public bodies are responsible to eliminate discrimination and promote equality and publish the details of such initiatives in their annual reports. 

These laws also specify that it is not the responsibility of those who claim unfair treatment to provide evidence but it is the responsibility of the alleged discriminator to prove his/her legitimacy. Those who ignore the implementation of the affirmative action laws are heavily penalized and the penalty could include imprisonment as well.


In this regard article 27 of the Constitution of Pakistan prescribes mechanism to safeguard against discrimination. This article authorizes the parliament to make effective legislation in order to redress the under-representation of any class or area in the service of Pakistan. 



Under this provision the parliament of Pakistan devised provincial quota system for federal services as well as for admission in federal institutes/universities so as to provide equal opportunity/representation to all the provinces. According to this quota system, the share of Punjab (including federal capital Islamabad) in federal services and admissions in educational institutes is 50%, Sindh 19% (11.4% rural and 7.6% Urban), KPK 11.5 %, Baluchistan 6%, GB & FATA 4%, AJK 2% and the remaining 7.5% for the open merit. 

Now let us see if the above affirmative action is implemented by federal public bodies in its true letter and spirit. In this regard a news item appeared in some sections of the press recently (July 2, 2014) which concludes that the ‘Senate committee on job quota failed to do its job’. This committee was formed around four years ago (Sep 2010) when some Senators from the smaller provinces complained against non-implementation of the provincial job quota in federal services. 



The committee was headed by the then leader of the house Nayyar Bokhari and was tasked to review the appointment between 2007 and 2010. The committee conducted around 32 meetings but could not produce the final report and now it has been dissolved as the subject matter has been transferred to Senate Standing Committee on Law and Justice. So that’s the state-of-the-art of the government initiatives regarding implementation of the affirmative actions to provide equity based representation and distribution of services and resources to all the provinces. 

Now the incumbent Government could appoint another committee to find out the reasons as to why the Senate’s Special Committee on Job Quota failed to do its job in 4 years? And this process could continue endlessly without delivering anything good to the masses. 

The under-represented classes and areas are continuously crying for justice. Leaving other federal bodies/institutes aside let us look at the biased and discriminatory attitude of the country’s premier education related body i.e. the Higher Education Commission (HEC). In this regard an important source of reference could be the letter written in July 2012 by the then Governor of Baluchistan Mr Zulfiqar Ali Magsi to the Prime Minister of Pakistan which says that  ‘provincial quota in Higher Education Commission (HEC) becomes 6 percent while only 0.9 percent employments have been given to the province’.

Similarly, Sindh Chapter of the Federation of All Pakistan Academic Staff Association (FAPUASA) urged the Prime Minister and the President of Pakistan to make the Higher Education Commission accountable for continued discrimination against Sindh in terms of distribution of services and resources (Press Release Jan 1, 2014).


In response to this complaint the then Executive Director who is now the incumbent Chairperson of HEC visited the HEC Regional Centre Karachi and assured FAPUASA Sindh Chapter that an independent inquiry would be held to review HECs services and resource distribution since 2002 and in the light of the findings of this inquiry a transparent mechanism would be devised for better implementation of the affirmative action. 


Unfortunately, even after six months there had been no any progress towards this aim and the biased and discriminatory policies are going on continuously. As a proof of biased attitude one could cite HEC’s own data. According to HEC’s annual report 2010-11 the percentage of province-wise distribution of scholarships is: Punjab 66.5; KPK 21.7; Sindh 5.7; Federal 3.5; AJK 1.9; Baluchistan 0.6 and FATA 0.5.These figures are clearly against the constitutionally approved rights of the smaller provinces specially in the case of Sindh and Baluchistan! 

Similar trend of distribution could easily be found for research and development grants, travel grants, number of tenure track faculty members, number of national and international seminars and conferences grants, number of Business Incubator Centres, number and location of federal Universities/institutes such at COMSATS, number of HEC funded research journals, number of Campus Management Software Solutions, number of sports events and many other projects.  

It is not only Sindh and Baluchistan but recently Vice-Chancellors of 18 public sector Universities of KPK also issued a joint statement regarding continued biased attitude of HEC in terms of job/admission quota and distribution of resources (reported in press on July 3, 2014). The Vice-Chancellors have complained that not only HEC but except the QAU, all other 13 public sector federal Universities neither implement job nor admission quota despite the facts that the major portion of funding goes to federal Universities due to biased attitude of HEC.  

It is pertinent to note that the non-implementation of the affirmative action is the violation of the Constitution of Pakistan and may lead Pakistan’s already fragile federation towards a serious national crisis! It is the time that the government pays heed to this very important issue and learning from other countries moves toward more positive discrimination to compensate the loss of the under-represented classes and areas.


 To this aim a joint committee consisting of Senators from smaller provinces and representatives of the University teachers may immediately be constituted to conduct a thorough review of HEC and prepare 5 year strategic plan for the future. 

source: http://viewpointonline.net/2014/07/vp212/time-to-end-hec-s-discriminatory-attitude-towards-sindh-baiochistan